Contact Us

 

 

  

Address: Beijing's xizhimen south street, xicheng district

 

The British garden 1 floor. Room 824

 

Zip code: 100035

 

Telephone: 010-58562339

 

Fax: 010-58562339

 

Email address: cngjzj@163.com

 

Web site (click on the url link directly left) :

 

http://www.cngjzj.com/

 

Blog (click on the url link directly left) :

http://blog.sina.com.Cn/CNGJZJ

 

To xizhimen south street, xicheng district building to the British garden route

L airport line 1

Take the airport shuttle from the airport, the dongzhimen station transfer to metro line 2 to xizhimen direction and get off at xizhimen station, from C outbound, go straight to the east 100 meters on the right side to xizhimen south street, north to walk to the t-junction namely to the British garden 1 floor downstairs.

L airport line 2

From the capital airport take airport bus to xidan, get off at no.22, take a taxi to xizhimen south street English garden 1 floor.

L bus subway near:

106 bus GuanYuan: 107 road, express way

Bus: xizhimen south road 387, 44 road, inner ring 800, 816 road, inner ring 820, 845 road

Che zhuang: subway line two

Xizhimen subway: metro line 2

Buses and attempts: 107 road, 118 road, 701 road

Buses and north zhuang: 209 road, 375 road, 392 road

 

Your position is: Home >> newspaper >> newspaper

Please give TCM a fair chance

2017年12月10日

复制链接 打印 大 中 小

<

Please give TCM a fair chance

2017-12-10 red network (changsha)


In a recent article in nature, an article on the need to question some Chinese medicine without clinical trials has stirred up a debate about TCM. Under the leadership of some scientific advocates, it is a great human being to scold Chinese medicine.

Is there really no chance for TCM? Modern medical theories originated in the west and developed hundreds of years. Although TCM has its own set of system and theoretical basis, it seems absurd in modern science. I'm not saying that at any point of view of traditional Chinese medicine, is very scientific, but since we have an advocate of science, that must follow the scientific thinking method to considerations of traditional Chinese medicine, rather than blindly believe it feudal superstition and will reject it.

Modern scientific thought is the basis of fair, if you really look down upon Chinese, so you always from their own point of view to look at the traditional Chinese medicine, so the following confirmed, falsified, and rational doubt such as phase will have a strong subjective consciousness. Some people say that the basic theory of traditional Chinese medicine is not convincing, so there is no need to study it. Tu's example of the extraction of artemisinin is debunking the fact that she was the first to find artemisinin from the ancient side. So TCM is still worth studying, not worthless.

People don't believe in traditional Chinese medicine is often unclear because of utility theory, namely we usually buy a box of traditional Chinese medicine, in the pharmacology principle that bar often say "no" or no the specifications, in the side effects of the bar and says "it is not clear. People always to the unknown is full of fear, it's understandable, but, when you buy a box of cephalosporins, it reads "clinical manifestations of a few patients after taking this medicine, renal damage" don't you eat? For example, the upper fire in the western medicine perspective is endocrine imbalance and mild inflammation. If be treated completely according to the western medicine method, that still need to go to the hospital to register the doctor's infusion. But it can completely solve with a bezoar detoxify piece, though its packaging above writing is "unclear", but in one thousand, settling down the experience tells us that it can cure were mentioned, and the effect is very good. So we should do, not yell bezoar detoxify piece is Chinese traditional medicine, the careful consideration when using, it should use the methods of modern science to understand its side effects and its pharmacology principle. This will help Chinese medicine practitioners who can't find out the principles of their medicine, and use scientific tools and methods to study it.

The whole negation of Chinese medicine practitioners is actually confused with the relationship between culture and science. But even hu shi, the representative of the whole westernization, is not resistant to Chinese medicine and even supports it. He does not believe in the theory of Yin and Yang of traditional Chinese medicine, but he knows that TCM can cure diseases and benefit from it. But what is the difference between those who call themselves science advocates, and who don't spare no effort to resist traditional Chinese medicine? In the long run, there will be fewer and fewer people studying Chinese medicine. Imagine, years later, when a foreign scholar, with the ancient Chinese medicine practitioners, tells the new discovery with a theory that conforms to modern science.