"More than half the doctor take kickbacks" whether out of context is not important

Sources: jinan daily

        "More than half the doctor take kickbacks" whether out of context is not important

        "54% of the doctors said they had had to accept drug rebate behavior, and 39% said have received a pharmaceutical company meeting aid." On November 2,, in the second china-us health summit, the Chinese medical association secretary of the party committee RaoKeQin as evidence that China's medical industry professional ethics construction necessity. Then, RaoKeQin again and said, "this is but quoted a survey result, but by many media error reading, out of context. (comprehensive recently the China youth daily, China network) "54% the doctor take kickbacks" is a reference, not I said RaoKeQin -- the "deny, inconsistent. Whether reference or "self", since in an important meeting speak out, at least also prove his a point of view identity. If want to explain this with their irrelevant and this relationship I'm afraid it is difficult to skim clear.

        Look at RaoKeQin identity, it is not difficult to understand his urgent roar clarified the reason. He is the Chinese medical association secretary of the party committee, so that's "family skeleton," will not only cause the personage inside course of study of complaints and condemn, will incur related leadership and even on the warpath. So, RaoKeQin counterattack media "out of context" his own "difficulties".

        However, the effect of RaoKeQin moved to decline. The reason is that, "half the doctor take kickbacks", match the public past "subjective judgement", also proved the past repeated exposure in the media, the doctor take kickbacks phenomenon is not invented.

        The doctor this group's mainstream is good, this is to first of all for sure. However, there is a fact that can't deny the fact that, nowadays, a drug from the factory, to the pharmaceutical companies, pharmaceutical representatives, the hospital, the doctor to the patient to sell, this is a complete interests chain, prices layers of pyramid, some people have benefited, and finally full impute to undertake patients. This is medical field of latent rules, in the industry is also a kind of "ecological", even if the individual doctors medical ethics and noble, also hard to avoid is not in raged. Otherwise, he will become a kind of social "alternative" the crowding out, even unable to survive. For example, XiaoQiWei was supported in sichuan "the black doctor", but be counterparts as want to "undermine the hospital bad guys", everyone go to the whole him, finally forced to go work in shandong province.

        Individual drug layer upon layer "rake-off", profit ultra 1300% or even 2000%, like this kind of medicines, I'm afraid not case-by-case. So, like this class has high rebate medicines, once scored a success or N hospitals, open this drug some doctors will be "courtesy" difficult "empire", cannot become drug "rake-off" outsiders - no matter what in the doctor is active or passive.

        RaoKeQin called for, the doctor is a special profession, and need to get the respect. That is quite true, doctor not bring shame on and demonize, but not enough pathomeiosis, to medical treatment field for some turn a blind eye. "More than half the doctor take kickbacks", the figures are accurate, is RaoKeQin said, media whether "out of context," I think argument or not, or deny, meaning is not large, but also is not important. Importantly, nowadays, the doctor receiving kickbacks phenomenon is more serious.

        Whether RaoKeQin or the media, can be in different occasions stressed "54% the doctor take kickbacks", the goal all roads lead to Rome, original intention is to strengthen the construction of medical ethics, abandon the doctor receiving kickbacks this ignominy, reshape the professional image. Based on this, RaoKeQin and deny, ravel in "54% the doctor take kickbacks" whether by the media out of context, and the media as a, common inquiry contain the doctor receiving kickbacks effective path, for the relevant departments to provide a decision-making reference, avoid the people interests are devouring, this is not a good thing? Besides, this is also a scholar should take social responsibility. (YuQiaoFu)