Health: "maotai plasticizer door" will not be rashomon

MaDiMing (citizen)

Sources: health

        Blog da "crystal emperor" 9, in his blog released 53 degrees flying maotai Hong Kong inspection test results. According to the "crystal emperor" posted inspection report, this bottle of 200 ml was cleared of maotai detection phthalate (2 - ethyl) has ester (DEHP, plasticizer a) content is 3.3 mg/L, the data than the Chinese wine industry association previously quoted national standards high 120%. (December 10, of the securities times)

        Then the personage inside course of study says, cleared the maotai is adulterated wine. The relevant person in charge of maotai also responded that, the company factory product plasticizer index all conform to the state department for limited.

        The market does have a lot of false maotai, however "crystal emperor" inspection samples is the true wine adulterated wine, both didn't see also didn't test before the can't easily. A mouth said the family take is adulterated wine, can only say that is the personage inside course of study some urgent mood. And what the maotai factory products are all accord with national requirements that are worth discussing. The original has been said, plasticizer is not within the scope of testing, the country is also not the requirements and current detection method is not perfect... How suddenly, maotai brewery there has, in testing? Maotai very early self-checking plasticizer, rather than "plasticizer storm" before start? Otherwise, how say "factory products all meet the requirements"? But this is not to say there is no possible, but how to QuXinYuRen, I'm afraid is a problem.

        Maotai wine and alcoholic compared, regardless of position and value are the cannot be mentioned in the same breath. The status and value of maotai liquor and won't affect the relevant aspects in "maotai plasticizer door" on the various considerations, it is a problem, is not a figment of the yield, but a similar situation is many. Such as melamine event process, the component and some people had thundered, stand in the protection of the national industry highly integrated balance some problems. Of course should protect national industry, and no one would like some national food industry collapse, but to protect national industry and industry and public health should not be contradictory problem, or only the public health in the first place, the national industry could be better protection. And now there is a problem, a very one-sided emphasis on certain issues, frequently take out "beat all" inertial thinking, this is not reasonable.

        If the kind of thinking or treat "maotai plasticizer door", reason will also is very full, such as national brands, Chinese wine culture representative, etc., component of course is quite heavy.

        Of course, no matter how to say, now worry "maotai plasticizer door" difficult to have the truth, may become rashomon, there is no basis. But regulators, authorities have to stand up and talk, but can't let users and the personage inside course of study, maotai wine each said between the words. Now who is actually that is not credible: all take to detection of maotai is not necessarily true wine maotai wine, the so-called "all meet the requirements," said also from card not clean. However the most worrisome situation or, the government department all "dozen soy sauce", for the sake of what considerations and clam up; The results not only maotai not clean, will also take on working regulation.