Health: baby doctor check proof irreproachable

Luo Zhihua (doctor)

Release date: 2013-10-28

Source: health

        Born only 21 days baby but missing mom, because can't drink milk powder, crying, hungry for two days, little face lost a big circle. Besides eating, he seems to have a cold, nose, mouth breathing, is very poor. The feeling be nasty under, the baby's father held him to the nearest hospital. However, the doctor said, must show id card, birth certificate or mother to give the child to see the doctor. (September 20, the wuhan evening news)

        This news is some websites, changed its name to the wuhan hospital refuse to give the baby to see a doctor "has no ZhunShengZheng. Mother home meant originally called for babies, is replaced with the condemnation of the hospital refused to treat, the news is not the key sentence is carried out, from netizens bristle, think the hospital is not satisfactory. But the author thinks that, the hospital the blameless.

        Both adults and children, the hospital sees a doctor must first clear of the patient's identity, because each kind of medical operation are joint and several liability, when the responsibility main body could not clear, the hospital is there not fear "civet cats in prince"? If a dispute, the hospital doesn't even have inspection as to the identity of the program, is likely to cause trouble. The legal obligations in the rule of law society, the hospital may be blameless.

        And, the hospital is not only to protect themselves. As an important link in prevention of trafficking baby, hospital examine babies identity, is also in the performance of social responsibilities. Shaanxi fuping li case one of the biggest characteristic, is the baby's future is not in accordance with the program operation, without careful inspection status and handover. If the hospital is the vulnerability, will bring convenient li behavior. For cooperate with the need to crack down on crimes, such as li, hospital the move also blameless.

        Inspection status, of course, can not affect cure patents, cure is always the first. Proof of identity is required inspection hospital, do not know the baby's birth certificate and the fact that his mother's id is taken away. When a baby is urgent, and knowing that the parents couldn't get the identity also refused to treatment, the hospital's behavior should be blamed, but did not appear such circumstance, the behavior of the hospital is blameless.

        Born just 21 days of the baby was abandoned by his mother, moral stick should point to his mother. When hospital behavior is not too much wrong, not to an imaginary results as the basis of moral condemnation. Between doctor and patient is easy to appear problem, small thing can be warm, originally is not a problem, it is easy to be amplified in question. It should be pointed out that, improper medical behavior to exposure, but artificially tear the doctor-patient relationship, obviously against anyone.