"Blood donation points" contentious is the education fair anxiety 
 
 
The 2014-09-25 

 
Source: health
 
 
Wang Yan tiger (graduate) 

        In July, pujiang county, zhejiang province, policies, unpaid blood donation of more than 4000 ml, immediate children attend an examination points can be obtained. Among them, 4000 ml of blood donation and 1, 6000 ml and 2 points, more than 8000 ml with three points. Some netizens said, if the policy can encourage more people to join the team of blood donation without compensation, this is a good thing. , however, some worry that the move will lead to some parents blindly to donate blood, cause problems. (September 24, qianjiang evening news)

        All involve the test points of policy, is always growing attention of the public, "plus" blood donation is no exception. Under the voluntary unpaid blood donation underpowered reality, to test the bonus incentive to donate blood, pujiang is; And some people on bonus policies will lead to the concerns of the "blind" to donate blood, under the component will compete for the entrance exam of pattern, also makes sense.

        However, overly obsessed with the "plus" blood donation policy itself, is not necessary. "Plus" blood donation is actually good guidance, under the condition of the strict limit, from paper to fall to the ground, will weaken the marginal utility is very small. On the one hand, points threshold is 4000 ml, that in an adult each quantity 200 ml to 400 ml, two times a year to donate blood, very few people have reached this standard, let alone a 8000 ml. On the other hand, the policies of add three more points, inspire significance is limited. And also by the constitution, blood type, age, blood donation behavior factors, such as public welfare concept, true to get points and blood donation is rare.

        Or is based on this, pujiang quantity in 4000 milliliter above only 50 people. Besides, there, and not all of the children who will take part in an examination. This itself shows that really stick to donate blood for a long time, is really just a handful of people. And fundamentally speaking, in the case of public welfare concept did not deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, hope that the enthusiasm of blood donation without compensation to examination points among citizens, not reality. "Blood donation points" rather than a guide, as a reward for positive blood donors.

        Pegged to the entrance points, but because the policy ever any studies related to parents. This is what "blood donation points" the cause of the controversy. Some people are worried "blood donation points" cause "blind" to donate blood, don't worry about can't enjoy the policy, but touched off the anxiety about the education fair.

        In fact, in the blood donation policy of pujiang, unpaid blood donation reached a certain standard, is not only favorable points, in addition to the free use, the right of first blood, improve the reimbursement ratio also has access to health care in hospital, free ride in the city public transport, such as preferential, and certain cash incentives. But why the public examination of them only add cent so sensitive? The reason is that the public system of education fair stretched too nervous. After all, under the social structure of social mobility is not so smooth, mainly rely on the rise in the channel entrance or ordinary people. But in public welfare and education entanglements, ultimately is not a good the right direction. Public welfare of public welfare, education to education, every man unto his place, according to each department and is a normal running status in society. What time, the balance of education resource distribution, individual give prize on talent than identity, this "plus" blood donation policy can disappear completely.