Comments: the doctor banned red light has the law also can't
 
 
The 2014-11-03 
 
 
Source: Beijing times 

        Legislation is a commitment. "Doctors accept red envelopes" ban from industry constraint level rise to the legal level, accompanied by such guarantee: will provide a clear complaint channel, provides a complete and efficient judicial process. 
 
        Doctors to receive patients "red envelopes", will be suspended for six months to a year of the practice, if the circumstances are serious, shall be revoked its practice certificate - to come into force as of November 1, the new "regulations on the administration of medical institutions in chongqing, because of the rule and cause the extensive concern of the public opinion. 
 
        Now, the rhythm of the health care reform, more and more intense, anti-corruption object to the general industry extension of corruption, the rule of law become the fourth plenary session after the Chinese keywords of social governance. "Doctors accept red envelopes" ban written to the local laws and regulations, is focused on the three kinds of social trends, can be seen as a kind of to explore the rule of law to promote health care reform. 
 
        Just, "red envelopes" into the method of history is taking longer than we thought. At least in 1999 began to implement the professional medical practitioners law of the People's Republic of China, there are rules prohibit doctors "lean on, solicit or illegally accept patients' property or seek other illegitimate gains", or be given a warning or ordered to suspend under six months to a year of practice; If the circumstances are serious, shall be revoked the certificate of its practice. The newly revised regulations of chongqing, although legislation level and starting point is different, but the main content is basically reiterated to the rules. Interval of 15 years, the red culture is still rampant, the legislation is still in the "reaffirmed", which is equal to the said ban doctors accept red envelopes, ACTS is not enough to do. 
 
        What belongs to the "serious"? Warning, suspension of six months practicing, pause for a year of punishment, receive a red envelope behavior of the corresponding to what extent? Obviously, this is legislation does not solve the problem, can only margin in the judicial practice, on the basis of the experience of the multiple case find difference and boundary. Also, since the regulations to implement the main body of punishment is "health department in charge of family planning", so also should be defined in the law enforcement, which department to accept the complaints, divided into several specific complaint channels, processes, how to, processing time is long. The accuracy and efficiency of law enforcement, to a great extent, determines the authority of the law, determines the law in people heart "useful" or "no". 
 
        A sense, the legislation is a promise. "Doctors accept red envelopes" ban from industry constraint level rise to the legal level, accompanied by such guarantee: will provide a clear complaint channel, provides a complete and efficient judicial process. In chongqing, after the enforcement of laws and regulations, health family planning departments regularly publish at the complaints of patients to accept the situation, to receive a red envelope behavior of punishment, not in violation of relevant laws and regulations, public few questions for a red envelope of the typical case in court, concentrate on get through the barriers of laws and regulations on the practicability and operability. Only let people dare to engage in a lawsuit, will engage in a lawsuit, convenient and engage in a lawsuit, the medical conflicts into the orbit of the rule of law, in order to promote the rule of law reform legislation original intention to achieve. 
 
        Also, about "doctors accept red envelopes" ban into the method of first try first meaning, also can from the simple legislation level into the rule of law level. (commentators bright had)
 
 
The original link: http://www.jkb.com.cn/news/commentary/2014/1103/354129.html