Comment on: "operating room take" public opinion reverse deserves reflection 
 
 
The 2014-12-25 13:23:28 
 
 
Source: Beijing youth daily 

    Take "the last few days," the operating room has always been a lively topic of public opinion field. In the operating room to take on the public opinion of a very unusual twist. Photos just one appearance, is almost a one-sided criticism; Then released as the truth, the drama began turning point; Finally party patient comes out said, and wonder "doctor so long held on to my leg pain, think impassability, why you want to criticize them", the whole drama complete reversal, turning to focus on the ethics of reports, and reflection to "alert to mistrust flood".
 
    "Operating room take" event, the drama, the public opinion turning, worthy of attention, also worth thinking about. In this case, you first need to think about ethical issues of public opinion. Reduction event happened, started in micro letter circle: on August 16, is there a doctor in the circle of micro letter sent photos; On December 20, someone posted on weibo, and with the comment: "as a medical staff so I want to say it is no wonder that the doctor-patient relationship nervous, operation at the same time, what are you doing?" On the evening of December 20, a media official microblogging forwarding, and published "said today (Monday) for fast", then set off public opinion field.
 
    "Friends", like this is just the norm of since the media age. If there is no definition of the incident, no media attention, in particular, are likely to be submerged in the ocean of information. So, who define who release is very important. It also brought the ethical problems of the media in the media environment, its meaning more than a general sense of media ethics. Facing the fragmentation of information, the average person doesn't have the ability to review, but has the authority to review and forward. This also reminds us that, in the media age, everyone must carefully your comments and forwarding, especially the mainstream in the mainstream media should take more responsibility, can't see the wind is the rain.
 
    Secondly, need to think about the current doctor-patient relationship. A bad of the doctor-patient relationship, not only is the doctor's pain, and pain of patients. The current doctor-patient relationship, maybe not so good, but it is not some people say that bad. To ignore the existence of numerous doctors conscience, and ignoring some doctors moral, as serious, even more serious. It is true that in reality there are a few "bad doctors", but not all doctors so, also is not the mainstream. Ignore the fundamentals of the industry, not only for the doctor's irresponsible, and due to the existence of "honor corrosion effect", will lose other doctors professional honor, which is also irresponsible for patients.
 
    Finally, thinking of the hospital and responsibility. Reverse of the "operating room take" public opinion is very important, from the plot have reported. This means that every step forward on information disclosure, on the doctor-patient relationship will improve. In the event, the hospital is not without question. FengCheng hospital said, "as soon as possible in order to eliminate the negative influence, also from the perspective of further strict with the doctor, we chose to be given a heavier punishment when processing." It is very puzzling, because public opinion attention, don't wrong, lose judgment, will choose to sacrifice the interests of the parties? This "shall be given a heavier punishment", and officials shout out "who hit my brand, whose job is to hit", what the difference?
 
    "Operating room take the public opinion of" reverse deserves reflection. As had a pour point to doctor, one-sided criticism of public opinion, now also is a kind of bias. Happened in the operating room take rest, media, community, hospital should find lessons.
 
Mao Jianguo (jiangsu)